Featured
Rimsys Announces Rimsys AI to Eliminate Repetitive Tasks and Enhance Decision-Making for MedTech Regulatory Teams
Rimsys, the leading Regulatory Information Management (RIM) platform for the MedTech industry, today announced the launch of Rimsys AI, a suite of embedded artificial intelligence (AI) agents.
The ultimate guide to the EU MDR/IVDR unique device identifier (UDI) System
This article is an excerpt from The ultimate guide to the EU MDR/IVDR UDI ebook.
Table of contents
- Overview
- UDI basics and benefits
- UDI format requirements and issuing entities
- UDI rules for specific device types
- Implementation of UDI and UDAMED in the European Union
- US vs EU UDI comparison
The EU Medical Device Regulation (2017/745) (“MDR”) and EU In Vitro Diagnosis Regulation (2017/746) (“IVDR”) introduce two new systems for information exchange: UDI (Unique Device Identifier) for device identification and EUDAMED (European Databank on Medical Devices) to centralize and disseminate information. UDI is a specific code assigned to all devices and higher levels of packaging. This will allow for devices being sold in the European market to be identified and traced through a globally harmonized approach. EUDAMED is the IT system developed by the European Commission to replace the EUDAMED2 database previously in place under the Medical Device Directives (MDD). EUDAMED is a multi-functional system that will be used to coordinate device registration, provide information about devices to industry professionals and the public, and highlight necessary safety details.
The EU MDR and IVDR UDI system is based upon the guidance of the International Medical Device Regulators Forum (IMDRF). It’s a globally harmonized system that’s designed to increase patient safety and optimize care.
UDI system goals
Increase patient safety
- Improve tracing of devices
- Reduce the presence of counterfeit devices
Ensure access to accurate information
- Unambiguous identification of devices throughout distribution and use
Improve post-market surveillance
- Improve accessibility of adverse event reports
Enhance supply chain Management
- Streamline supply chain process and inventory management
- Simplify medical device documentation processes
The UDI system has four key elements
Element 1: Assignment of UDI (UDI Components)
The first element of the UDI system is the assignment of a UDI. The UDI is a code of alphanumeric characters that acts as the access key to information about a specific medical device on the market. The EU MDR and EU IVDR requires that a UDI be assigned to all medical devices except for custom-made or investigational devices. There are three components of a UDI:
- Basic UDI-DI
- UDI (consisting of UDI-DI and UDI-PI)
- Packaging UDI (Note: This is not an official term used in the EU MDR and IVDR, but we’re using it to help explain the concept. The Packing UDI is part of the UDI itself.)
1. Basic UDI-DI
The Basic UDI-DI identifies the device group that a particular device fits into. A device group is a group of products that all share the same intended purpose, risk class, essential design, and manufacturing characteristics. A device group is generally classified by medical device manufacturers as a “Product Family” or “Product Category,” depending on the internal nomenclature used within the company. The Basic UDI-DI functions as a parent or higher-level descriptor of a device.
NOTE: There can only be one Basic UDI-DI per UDI-DI.
The Basic UDI-DI is not printed on the product itself or on the packaging of a product, but rather it must be included in the following documents and applications:
- Certificates (Including Certificate of Free Sale)
- EU Declarations of Conformity
- Techical Documentation
- Summary of Safety and Clinical Performance
2. UDI (UDI-DI and UDI-PI)
The second component is the UDI itself, which consists of two parts:
Device Identifier (DI)
Production Identifier (PI)
The UDI-DI (Device Identifier DI, also referred to as “static”) identifies specific, detailed information about a particular device. If any of the below details should change, the device will need a new UDI-DI.
- Name or trade name of the device
- Device version or model
- If labelled as a single use device
- Packaged as sterile
- Maximum number of uses
- Need for sterilization before use
- Quantity of devices provided in a package
- Critical warnings or contra-indication
- CMR/endocrine disruptors
NOTE: There can be several UDI-DIs for one Basic UDI-DI.
Meanwhile, the UDI-PI (Production Identifier PI, also referred to as "dynamic") contains manufacturing information (including serial number, lot/batch number, software identification, and manufacturing or expiry date or both types of dates.)
To better illustrate this concept of Basic UDI-DI and UDI (UDI-DI and UDI-PI), let’s use a syringe as an example. The Basic UDI-DI would identify the category of a syringe, for example, "Enteral (Oral) Syringe."
A 5ml Enteral (Oral) Syringe – Sterile (Color: Purple) would get a unique UDI-DI and a 10m Enteral (Oral) Syringe – Sterile (Color: Orange) would get a unique UDI-DI. Both products would be associated to the same Basic UDI-DI. In this case, the "Enteral (Oral) Syringe," which defines the category.
Each time that 5ml Enteral (Oral) Syringe – Sterile (Color: Purple) is manufactured at the same revision, it will get a new UDI-PI per lot. See the graphic below.
Each product is identical and therefore has the same UDI-DI. However, the UDI-PI changes to reflect the manufacturing date, lot number, expiry date, and serial number, as applicable.
The UDI will contain all device-specific information and have the same functions as the comparable database (GUDID) of the United States FDA. The main difference (in EUDAMED) is that the UDI data is divided into components of Basic UDI-DI, UDI, and Packaging UDI.
3. Packaging UDI
The third component of UDI is the Packaging UDI. (Note: This is not an official term used in the EU MDR and IVDR, but we’re using it to help explain the concept.)
Each level of packaging, except shipping containers, must receive its own unique UDI. Packaging UDI refers to the unique UDI assigned to higher levels of packaging instead of the device itself.
In the event of significant space constraints on the unit of use packaging, the UDI Carrier may be placed on the next higher packaging level.
Returning to our earlier example of syringes, if a manufacturer first packages a single sellable syringe into an individual box, this package would receive its own UDI-DI and UDI-PI.
If then the manufacturer packages those individual boxes into containers of six (6), those containers would receive their own UDI-DI and UDI-PI.
And finally, if the manufacturer packages those six (6) containers into cases of four (4), those cases would receive their own UDI-DI and UDI-PI.
Each of those levels of packaging must be assigned its own UDI-DI and UDI-PI. The initial syringe did not change, but the way it is packaged did, therefore, requiring its own UDI-DI and UDI-PI.
Element 2: Placing UDI on the device and/or packaging
The second element to the UDI system is the placing of the UDI on the device or on its packaging through what is referred to as a “UDI Carrier.” The UDI Carrier is the part of the label that contains the UDI information that is applied directly to the device or included on the device packaging. The UDI Carrier should have both a machine-readable portion (AIDC) and a human-readable portion (HRI). (Specific details about each element of the UDI will be covered in Chapter 2.)
- Machine-readable form – AIDC – (Automatic Identification and Data Capture) is a barcode or other machine-readable technology that can be accessed automatically by scanning the UDI information.
- Human-readable form – HRI – (Human Readable Interpretation) is the numeric or alphanumeric code, which can be manually entered into the system for access to the UDI information.
If there are space constraints limiting the use of both the AIDC and HRI on the label, then only the AIDC is required to appear. However, on devices that are intended to be used in home-health care or other non-medical facility settings, the HRI would be required to appear.
Single-use devices may contain the UDI Carrier on its lowest level of packaging rather than on the device itself.
Reusable devices must include the UDI Carrier on the device itself, unless any type of direct marking would interfere with the safety or performance of the device, or if it is not technologically feasible to directly mark the device. If so, this should be properly documented in your design history file.
Most importantly, the UDI Carrier must be readable for the intended lifecycle of the device.
Below is an example of a GS1 AIDC and HRI barcode label.
Element 3: Storage of UDI information by Economic Operators
Storage of UDI information by "Economic Operators" is the third element of the UDI system. 2017/745 Articles 2(35), 22(1), and 22(3) define an economic operator as:
- A manufacturer
- An authorized representative
- A distributor
- An importer
- An investigator for clinical investigations
- A person who sterilizes systems or procedure packs
Class III, implantable device:
According to EU MDR 2017/745 Annex II, the manufacturer shall keep an updated list of all UDIs that it has assigned. Economic operators and all health institutions are required to store, preferably by electronic means, the UDI of all the devices for which they have supplied or with which they have been supplied.
For Devices Other than Class III:
Member States are encouraged, and in some cases require, health institutions to store, preferably by electronic means, the UDI of the devices with which they have been supplied. The UDI must also be included in any field safety notice for reporting serious incidents and field safety corrective actions.
The EU MDR and EU IVDR also give the European Commission authority to make additional requirements regarding the submission or maintenance of UDI information. In making those decisions, the European Commission must consider six (6) areas:
- Confidentiality and data protection
- Risk-based approach
- Cost-effectiveness of the additional measures
- The need to avoid duplications in the UDI system
- The needs of the healthcare systems of the member states
- Harmonization with other medical device identification systems
To continue reading this eBook including information about the EUDAMED database, UDI format requirements and issuing entities, implementation timelines, and key differences between the EU and US UDI systems, please register to download the full version
A look at the FDA Total Product Life Cycle Advisory Program (TAP)
The Total Product Life Cycle Advisory Program (TAP) is a voluntary pilot program launched by the FDA’s Center for Devices and Radiological Health (CDRH) in October 2023. The TAP Pilot is one of the commitments between the FDA and industry as part of the MDUFA V reauthorization, which aims to provide faster patient access to safe and effective medical devices, increase innovation, improve patient safety through enhanced surveillance and data collection, and provide a more efficient regulatory process for FDA and industry.
Taking a medical device from concept to commercialization in the United States is often a long and challenging process that involves participation and adoption from FDA, clinicians, payers, and patients. The TAP program is addressing the obstacles that device manufacturers often encounter throughout this process with:
- Early and frequent interactions: FDA will provide more opportunities for sponsors to interact with the agency early in the development process, which can help to identify and address potential issues early on.
- Strategic input from stakeholders: The program will involve input from a variety of stakeholders, including clinicians, patient advocates, and payers, which can help to ensure that the development of new devices is meeting the needs of patients and the healthcare system.
- Proactive, strategic advice from CDRH: FDA will provide proactive and strategic advice to sponsors throughout the development process, which can help to reduce the risk of regulatory delays.
Currently, TAP program membership includes the companies or individuals developing the medical devices, the medical device sponsors, dedicated staff within the CDRH, stakeholders consisting of clinicians, patient advocates, payers, and academic experts, and independent advisors. However, It is unclear if independent advisors will continue to be part of the program as TAP expands. Additionally, specific individuals involved in the TAP program at a given time will vary based on the device being developed and the stage of the development process.
While currently still in its pilot phase, the TAP program is open to a limited number of medical devices. To be considered for the program, device manufacturers must have breakthrough designation with no previous pre-submission meetings. The TAP program started with 15 cardiovascular devices last fall and is now at 31 enrolled devices as of February 2024. Enrollment could reach as high as 60 devices by the end of 2024.
As part of the MDUFA V reauthorization, the TAP Program shares the goal of facilitating the development of high-quality, safe, effective, and innovative medical devices. Additionally, the TAP Program strives to reduce device development time and costs through early and frequent feedback from FDA, increase innovation with more predictable and efficient regulatory pathways for new devices, and improve patient access to new devices.
Overall, the TAP program’s focus is on improving the medical device landscape by addressing various challenges and opportunities throughout the product lifecycle. The program's success will be measured by its ability to expedite development, foster innovation, ensure device quality, and ultimately, improve patient access to these potentially life-changing technologies. For more information about the TAP program and enrollment in it, visit FDA’s website.
_thumbnail.avif)
Are FDA risk classifications and submissions any different for SaMDs? [VIDEO]
The number of software as a medical device (SaMD) is growing and with it are questions about how to effectively obtain market clearance for them. One question we hear often is, “Are FDA risk classifications and submissions any different for SaMDs?” Currently, the FDA is regulating SaMDs the same way it’s regulating traditional medical devices. As a result, you’ll still have the same three risk classifications, Class I, Class II, and Class III.
The submission process is also the same. Most Class I devices are 510(k) exempt, and most class II devices would fall under a 510(k) or De Novo submission depending on whether or not substantial equivalence can be made to another US-marketed device. Most Class III devices require PMA submissions.
There have been discussions about FDA pre-certification programs and following IMDRF guidelines for SaMDs, which would alter the submission process and also the risk stratification of SaMDs. However, none of these discussions have matured. The FDA continues to mirror their risk classification and submission guidelines for SaMDs and traditional medical devices.
Watch the full answer to this question from our recent panel discussion with subject matter expert, Prabhu Raghavan of MDQR Solutions, below.
You can also download the full replay here to get answers to other common SaMD questions such as:
- How is the FDA regulating AI/ML in SaMDs?
- What is a Predetermined Change Control Plan (PCCP) for machine learning-enabled medical devices?
- What cybersecurity considerations sh ould be made when taking SaMDs to market?
An introduction to standards for medtech companies
A standard is a published document that is established by consensus and is approved by a recognized body (ISO, IEEE, UL, etc.). It outlines requirements, specifications, guidelines, or characteristics that are used in a repeated way to ensure that materials, products, processes, and services are developed for a specific purpose. Think of it as a formula for an agreed upon way of doing something that establishes the best way of performing a function. It could be developing a product, managing a process, or even supplying materials to a manufacturer.
Why are standards important?
Standards enable technology to work seamlessly across industries and markets and help to build consumer trust that products and services are designed to work together in an efficient way. They form the fundamental building blocks for product development by establishing consistent requirements that can be universally applied, practiced, and understood. For example:
- Quality standards reduce product failures on the assembly line.
- Environmental standards reduce environmental impacts, reduce waste, and provide sustainability.
- Health and safety standards reduce accidents in the workplace.
- Food safety standards prevent food from being contaminated.
To ensure standards stay relevant and are aligned with technology changes, many standards organizations require that their standards be reviewed periodically and updated as necessary.
Is an industry standard the same as a regulation?
No, but there is a very close relationship between the two. Simply put, a standard is a guideline whereas a regulation includes laws. Industry standards are used voluntarily (although strongly encouraged) while regulations are not voluntary because they are a requirement from a government agency or similar authority, i.e. ISO 13485 is a standard and building codes are regulations.
- Standards are technical documents, driven by consensus that are crafted by experts.
- Regulations are sometimes based on standards, created by a variety of individuals and entities, while overseen by federal, state, and/or municipal authorities.
It's important to note that while standards aren't mandated by law, many regulatory authorities recognize standards and recommend adherence to them in order to promote safety and quality.
What kind of standards are medtech manufacturers responsible for tracking?
The medical device industry has the responsibility for the design and manufacturing of a wide range of products used to diagnose and treat illnesses to improve health in patients. Medical device standards help ensure that a manufacturing or design process can consistently produce the quality required to serve patients and healthcare professionals around the world.
Some of the more common standards used by the medtech industry include, but are certainly not limited to:
ISO 9001 – A general standard (not industry specific) for quality management and implementing a rigorous quality system. For medtech specifically, it helps with the management of the quality control process by helping to keep costs low, improve accountability and simplify regulatory compliance.
ISO 13485 – This standard is designed for medtech specifically and expands on the framework set up by ISO 9001. Compliance with this standard helps with quality control, process validation, and risk management, often referred to as the risk management standard.
ISO 14971 – This standard specifies terminology, principles, and a process for the risk management of medical devices, including software and in vitro. This helps to identify hazards that may be associated with devices and to minimize those risks.
IEC 60601-1 – Medical Electrical Equipment, general requirements for basic safety and essential performance of equipment.
ISO 10993 – Biological evaluation of medical devices that includes biocompatibility testing of materials used to design product parts that would come into contact with a patient, testing for skin sensitization, and irritabilities.
ISO 15223 – Symbols to be used with information to be supplied by the manufacturer. This standard identifies symbols that are globally accepted to be used in a broad spectrum of medical devices. These symbols can be placed on the device, on the packaging, or on any accompanying information such as instructions for use.
ISO 45001 – This standard outlines the requirements for occupational health and safety management systems that can be employed in the medical device industry to help reduce occupational risk.
Where do I get these standards?
Standards used to design and build medical devices need to be purchased, and you must always maintain the most current revision of that standard to ensure proper adherence to it. They can be purchased as electronic copies, or you can request a paper copy for your files. You can purchase them directly from the standard organization (ISO, IEC, ASTM, UL, etc.). There are also organizations services that will provide standards from many organizations, serving as your to be your one-stop shop.
How do I know when standards change?
The best way to manage how you receive information about changes to industry standards would be to implement an electronic standard tracking system. These systems help to:
- Give you early notifications of changes
- Mitigate your company's risk by ensuring you're up-to-date
- Save you time by eliminating the tracking on your own
- Ensure your standards are up-to-date
Using manual processes such as spreadsheets to manage standards updates can be difficult, time-consuming, and lead to compliance risks - especially when a high number of standards and markets are involved. There are a variety of standards management tools to help medtech companies monitor and manage global standards, including Rimsys.
How can Rimsys help?
Rimsys’ regulatory management software offers standards management to help you stay ahead of the mayhem by providing:
- Access to a library of over 1.6 million global standards through a partnership with IHS Markit
- The ability to link standards to individual products to more easily assess the impact of changes across your product portfolio
- Automatic alerts when standards are changed, superseded, or withdrawn to reduce compliance risks and enable faster reaction times
- Bulk updates to your essential principles/GSPR tables when standards change for easier maintenance and compliance
For more information, visit www.rimsys.io/solutions/standards-management.
Why should you invest in your regulatory team? Easy Medical Device podcast interview
Recently, our Founder and CEO, James Gianoutsos, was a guest on an episode of the Easy Medical Device podcast. Hosted by Monir El Azzouzi, a quality and regulatory professional with over 16 years of industry experience, the Easy Medical Device podcast explores a wide range of topics, news, and challenges to help medtech quality and regulatory professionals gain valuable insights that will help them excel in their roles.
In the episode, Why should you invest in your regulatory team?, James and Monir explore the limitations of traditional cost-center approaches to resourcing and preparing budgets for regulatory affairs teams and discuss the benefits of treating regulatory affairs as a revenue function. Hear their thoughts about:
- How regulatory affiars teams are typically structured
- The importance of the RA job function on revenue
- The impact AI will have on regulatory affairs
- How digital tools can enable RA teams
James also provided tips RA professionals can use to convince their stakeholders to invest in regulatory affairs teams. He emphasized that getting buy-in often involves a mindset shift that will change the dynamic of the conversation. For example, when planning for a renewal, think about the financial impacts of missed renewals rather than the sheer volume of renewals you're doing.
When you're trying to convince your leadership team, don't talk about how many renewals I did for this product in a particular month. talk about the dollar figures you saved the company or retained on the market.
For more tips, listen to the full interview on the Easy Medical Device website.
Taking SaMDs to market in the US: How is the FDA regulating adaptive machine learning algorithms?
Rimsys recently held a panel discussion, Taking SaMDs to market in the US. During it, Prabhu Raghavan, Principal at MDQR Solutions, and Rimsys Chief Solutions Officer, Brad Ryba, shared an overview of SaMDs and provided their insights about getting and maintaining market clearance for them in the United States. Topics ranged from FDA risk classifications and submissions, cybersecurity best practices, and machine learning algorithms, which brought about an important question: How is the FDA currently regulating adaptive machine learning algorithms in SaMDS?
Adaptive machine learning algorithms use post-market data in real time and evolve their models based on the data they're consuming. As such, every patient utilizing a device with adaptive machine learning algorithms may have a new model compared to the previous patient. While the FDA doesn't have any formal guidance on the subject just yet, manufacturers can work with the FDA to get a plan in place for maintaining a state of validation post market.
Watch the snippet from the webinar to learn about taking a staged approach with the FDA to get a proper validation plan in place.
To watch all discussion topics, download the webinar replay here.
The five guiding principles for machine learning-enabled medical devices using PCCPs
On October 24th, 2023, the FDA, Health Canada, and the MHRA published a joint document providing harmonization for machine learning-enabled medical devices (MLMD) that use predetermined change control plans (PCCPs). PCCPs are plans proposed by the manufacturer that state the specific modifications to a MLMD, the process for implementing these modifications, and the assessment of impacts from them.
The document details five guiding principles for MLMDs in an effort to set a foundation for PCCPs and encourage collaboration on them. According to the UK government’s website, these principles are:
- Focused and Bounded: Describing specific changes that a manufacturer intends to implement.
- Risk-based: The intent, design, and implementation of a PCCP are driven by a risk-based approach that adheres to the principles of risk management.
- Evidence-based: Demonstrating that benefits outweigh the risks throughout the product lifecycle.
- Transparent: Provide clear and appropriate information and detailed plans for ongoing transparency to all stakeholders, from patients to healthcare professionals.
- Total Product Lifecycle Perspective: Improve the quality and integrity of a PCCP by continually considering the perspectives of all stakeholders.
Here are some examples of how these principles could be applied:
- Focused and bounded: A manufacturer of an MLMD that diagnoses cancer might develop a PCCP to implement a change to the algorithm that improves its accuracy in detecting a specific type of cancer.
- Risk-based: A manufacturer of an MLMD that monitors a patient's vital signs might develop a PCCP to implement a change to the algorithm that reduces the likelihood of false alarms.
- Evidence-based: A manufacturer of an MLMD that delivers medication to patients might develop a PCCP to implement a change to the algorithm that improves the accuracy of the dosage.
- Transparent: A manufacturer of an MLMD might publish a white paper that describes the device's algorithm and how it was developed and tested. The manufacturer might also make available a user manual that provides clear instructions on how to use the device safely and effectively.
- Total product lifecycle perspective: A manufacturer of an MLMD might collect feedback from patients and healthcare professionals on how the device is performing after it is marketed. The manufacturer might also use this feedback to identify and address any potential problems with the device.
The five guiding principles for MLMDs using PCCPs are based on the 10 guiding principles for Good Machine Learning Practices (GMLP) published in 2021, which were designed to help medical device manufacturers develop and deploy machine learning models that are safe, effective, and high quality. Similarly, the goal of these five guiding principles is to help MLMD manufacturers develop and maintain safe and effective products that meet the needs of patients and healthcare professionals. They are also intended to streamline the regulatory process for MLMDs, making it easier for manufacturers to bring new products to market and make updates to existing products in a timely manner.
If you’re looking for additional information about MLMD requirements in the US, join Rimsys and MDQR Solutions for Taking SaMDs to market in the US on Thursday, November 30th, at 1 PM ET. We’ll discuss the various types of SaMDs, considerations to make when obtaining market clearance, and how the FDA is regulating AI/ML in devices. Those interested in attending can register here: Taking SaMDs to market in the US.
