Announcing AI-Native Market Access Product for Regulated Products

Learn More

Thank you! Your submission has been received!
Oops! Something went wrong while submitting the form.
MedTech regulatory leaders reviewing regulatory insights and intelligence on a laptop
Thank you! Your submission has been received!
Oops! Something went wrong while submitting the form.
Thank you! Your submission has been received!
Oops! Something went wrong while submitting the form.
Webinars

Assessing RIM Maturity for Your Regulatory Management Strategy

December 3, 2024

Webinars

Leveraging Advancements in Regulatory Intelligence and AI for Medtech Success

October 3, 2024

Webinars

Navigating regulatory change: Why streamlined process management is critical for medtech regulatory teams

February 21, 2024

Webinars

Post-EU MDR Compliance: Key Insights and Activities to Maintain Compliance after Device Certification

December 14, 2023

Webinars

Taking SaMDs to market in the US

December 1, 2023

Webinars

MDR & IVDR Lessons for Regulatory Strategy

August 28, 2023

Blogs

Quick reference guide - global medical device UDI requirements and timelines

By

Bethaney Lentz

February 10, 2025

4 min read

This article was last updated on February 10, 2025.

What is UDI?

UDI systems are intended to benefit healthcare providers, manufacturers, authorized health authorities, hospitals and institutions, and individual consumers by providing:

  • Faster discovery of possible flawed medical device information by health authorities.
  • Quicker access to recall information, and visibility into current inventory.
  • A reduction in medical errors through consistently documented product expiration dates.
  • Identification of any counterfeit products being used in healthcare facilities.
  • Assurances that information regarding an implanted device is safely retained and traceable.

UDI timelines and deadlines vary by market, classification risk, and product and have been revised multiple times in some countries*. This article details the UDI deadlines for the countries which have announced specific programs (draft or implemented) and is current as of the date of this article.

*Note: these dates can change as participating countries adjust their plans. We do our best to update this as more information becomes available.
‍

‍Quick Links to country-specific sections:

General UDI labeling requirements

There are two components to a medical device UDI: the UDI device identifier (UDI-DI) and the UDI production identifier (UDI-PI). The UDI is presented as a barcode label (human and machine readable) on device packaging or on the device itself and acts as the access key to all device UDI attributes.

UDI-DI: This is the static portion of the UDI which identifies the manufacturer along with the specific device version. The UDI-DI (device identifier), also known as the Global Trade Item Number (GTIN) is assigned by an approved organization, such as GS1, and contains:

  • Company prefix
  • Manufacturers internal product code
  • Check character

The UDI-DI is the primary identifier to be used in looking up device attributes in country-specific databases and is assigned prior to placing a product on the market. Note that the device identifier is different for different packaging levels of the same device.

UDI-PI: This is the dynamic portion of the UDI which is assigned by the manufacturer and identifies one or more of the following:

  • Manufacturer’s lot or batch number
  • Serial number
  • Manufacturing date
  • Expiration date
  • Other attributes as defined by country-specific regulations 

The UDI-PI actual values do not appear in country-specific databases (with the exception of the EU vigilance database).

Australia UDI requirements

Australian UDIGuidelines
Reporting Database: AusUDID (pre-production)

The Australian government for medical devices, the TGA, has not launched any official regulations or timeline for mandatory UDI labeling. They do provide a wealth of information on their website that is worth reviewing. In the meantime, however, they are hoping for a Q1 2025 implementation.  The AusUDID Pre-Production environment is available for sponsors and manufacturers of medical devices supplied in Australia. It is a test environment that allows testing of data submission, prior to submission to the AusUDID Production environment. Any sponsor or manufacturer with an active TBS account can access the database.

Brazil UDI requirements

ANVISA UDI guidelines
Reporting database:TBD

RDC No. 591/2021 is the regulations guideline for the identification of medical devices regulated by ANVISA, implementing the Unique Identification of Medical Devices (UDI) system. In July 2024, ANVISA finalized amendment RDC No. 884/2024 which implemented various adjustments to RDC 591/2021. The biggest take-away regarding UDI is the extension of one year on the implementation deadlines.

Brazil compliance timeline
Device risk class Compliance dates (labeling)
Class IV Jul 2025
Class III Jan 2026
Class II Jan 2027
Class I Jan 2028

Canada UDI requirements


Health Canada website
Reporting Database: N/A
Position paper on the current state of UDI implementation
‍
Medtech Canada strongly supports the global initiative led by regulators under the guidance of the International Medical Devices Regulators Forum (IMDRF), which aims to standardize the identification of medical devices by requiring that certain medical devices carry an internationally recognized UDI. Currently, there is no process in place for UDI in Canada.

China UDI requirements

China (NMPA) website
Reporting Database: China National UDI Database
Announcement No 22 of 2023

On January 1, 2021, the NMPA implemented the UDI system for its first batch of medical devices, including 69 Class III devices. The following year, June 1, 2022, followed the implementation for the second batch of other Class III medical devices (including IVD reagents). Then in 2023, Order No. 22 announced the third batch of products to adopt the UDI system.

As of June 1, 2024, medical devices listed in the third batch implementation product catalog must have already had UDI implemented. According to the degree of risk and regulatory needs, some Class II medical devices in the third batch included high-demand single-use products, items selected for centralized procurement, and medical aesthetic products, totaling 103 types in 15 categories.

China compliance timeline
Device risk class Compliance date (labeling and registration)
Class III (subgroup) Jan 2021
Class III (remaining devices) Jun 2022
Class II Jun 2024 (estimated)
Class I Oct 2026 (estimated)

European Union UDI requirements

European Union UDI Information
Reporting Database: EUDAMED
Rimsys Updated EUDAMED Timeline Blog Post

The UDI & Devices module is expected to be declared fully functional by the end of Q2 2025 and mandatory for industry use on January 1, 2026. The EU continues to strongly recommend to the industry to establish its solution and to submit data on a voluntary basis.

European compliance timeline
Device risk class Compliance date
Class III and Class II implantables Dec 31, 2027
Class IIa and IIb May 26, 2023
Class I May 26, 2025
Class III - reusable May 26, 2023
Class IIa and IIb - reusable May 26, 2025
Class I - reusable May 26, 2027
Class D (IVD) May 26, 2023
Class B and C (IVD) May 26, 2025
Class A (IVD) May 26, 2027

India UDI requirements

Medical Devices Rules, 2017
Legal Metrology Act, 2009

Reporting Database: N/A

Rule 46 of Medical Device Rule 2017 was set to require UDI labeling by January 1, 2022. However, details on how the UDI needs to be implemented have not yet been released but India's labeling and traceability requirements must be met as per CDSCO regulations.

In addition to the Medical Device Rule 2017, the Legal Metrology Act, 2009 focuses on standardizing weights and measures and ensures that packaged commodities, including medical devices, are labeled with accurate and clear information.

Japan UDI requirements

Law to Ensure Quality, Efficacy and Safety of Pharmaceuticals, Medical Device, and Similar Products

Reporting Database: N/A

There are two regulatory authorities responsible for regulation of medical devices in Japan: The Ministry of Health, Labour and Welfare (MHLW) and the Pharmaceuticals and Medical Devices Agency (PMDA). The MHLW is responsible for the administrative actions such as guidance and approval, and judgment on whether or not a product is considered a medical device. The PMDA undertakes product review and post-market safety measures.

As of Dec 2022, bar code labeling based on international standards is required for immediate containers/wrappings/retail packages of medical devices. It is expected for barcodes to be displayed on every medical device in unit of use for patients. Japan was an early promoter of standardized barcodes and is still working towards harmonizing the requirements with global UDI expectations.

The Pharmaceuticals and Medical Devices Act (PMD Act) translates in Japanese meaning "Law to Ensure Quality, Efficacy and Safety of Pharmaceuticals, Medical Devices, and Similar Products," but is often shortened to Act on Pharmaceuticals and Medical Devices or just PMD Act.

Saudi Arabia UDI requirements

Requirements for Unique Device Identification (UDI for Medical Devices)
Reporting Database: Saudi-DI

The SFDA requires compliance with the Unique Device Identification (UDI) regulations on all medical device companies in Saudi Arabia for all classifications. Medical device classifications include: devices, IVD, non-medical IVD, chemical for medical use, distillation device, general lab use, HCT/Ps product and radiation devices.

Saudi Arabia compliance timeline
Device risk class Compliance dates (labeling and registration)
Class D (high risk) Sep 1, 2023
Class B & C (medium risk) Sep 1, 2023
Class A (low risk) Sep 1, 2024

Singapore UDI requirements

Guidance for UDI Implementation
Reporting Databases: Singapore Medical Device Register (SMDR) - For risk class B or higher, Class A Medical Device Database - Risk class A only

Singapore is now requiring compliance with UDI labeling and database registration. They will accept UDI labels for devices already marketed in the U.S. and the EU without any need for modification. However, if they are not marketed in either country, then they are required to implement via Singapore UDI regulations.

Companies are given an additional 6 months from the compliance date to deplete the respective medical devices that have been imported prior to the compliance date and exist in their current supply chain.

Note:

• UDIs will not be required for medical devices for clinical research, investigational testing or clinical trial and custom-made medical devices

• Medical devices authorized for supply via Special Access Routes (GN26, GN27, GN29) are required to comply with UDI requirement on a risk-calibrated approach

Singapore compliance timeline
Device risk class Compliance dates (labeling and registration)
High-risk implantable Nov 2022
Class D, General medical devices and IVDs Nov 1, 2024
Class C, General medical devices and IVDs Nov 1, 2026
Class B, General medical devices and IVDs Nov 1, 2028
Class A, General medical devices and IVDs Not required, voluntary

South Korea UDI requirements

Act on In Vitro Diagnostic Medical Devices
Act on Medical Devices
Reporting Database: South Korean Integrated Medical Device Information System (IMDIS)

South Korea has already implemented UDI regulations by Article 20-23 of the Medical Device Act (No. 14330) and Article 54-2 of Enforcement Regulations of Medical Device Act (No. 1512).  

South Korea compliance timeline
Device risk class Compliance dates (Labeling and registration)
Class IV (high risk) Jul 2019
Class III (serious risk) Jul 2020
Class II (potential risk) Jul 2021
Class I (lower risk) Jul 2022

Taiwan UDI requirements

Guidance document from Taiwan FDA
Reporting Database: TUDID

Taiwan has previously implemented UDI regulations, which include labeling and database reporting requirements.

Taiwan compliance timeline
Device risk class Compliance dates (labeling and registration)
Class III – implantable Jun 2021
Class III Jun 2022
Class II Jun 2023

United States UDI requirements

FDA website for UDI  
Reporting database: GUDID database

The United States has previously implemented UDI regulations, which includes labeling and database reporting requirements.

United States compliance timeline
Device risk class Compliance dates (labeling and registration)
Class III Sept 24, 2014
Class II Sept 24, 2016
Class II - reusable Sept 24, 2018
Class I Sept 24, 2018
Class I - reusable Dec 8, 2022

Country-specific UDI databases

Each country has their own UDI database and varying requirements for the data stored in those databases. There is overlap in the data required among the various UDI databases, but each country also has unique data they require. 

In addition, countries require that UDI-DI information be provided by “issuing entities.”  Note that with the exception of China, all countries accept GS1, HIBCC, and ICCBA as issuing entities.

UDI databases
Country Database Data attributes * Accepted issuing entities
Australia AusUDID tbd** tbd**
Brazil to be established 21 GS1, HIBCC, ICCBBA
China CUDID 51 GS1 China, ZIIOT, Ali Health
European Union EUDAMED 130 GS1, HIBCC, ICCBBA, IFA
Saudi Arabia Saudi-DI 35 GS1, HIBCC, ICCBBA
Singapore SMDR 13 GS1, HIBCC, ICCBBA
South Korea IMDIS UDID 40 GS1, HIBCC, ICCBBA
Taiwan TUDID 23 GS1, HIBCC, ICCBBA
United States GUDID 64 GS1, HIBCC, ICCBBA

* Data attributes are approximations based on country UDI requirements and include mandatory, optional, mandatory if applicable, and country database auto generated elements.

** Expected to be similar to US GUDID requirements.

Keeping pace with UDI regulations

Keeping track of country-specific UDI requirements, implementation timelines, and affected devices can be a big challenge to RA teams—especially because the information is scattered across many sources and simply hard to find. In this guide, we have consolidated timeline information and device class requirements across multiple countries. While we make every effort to provide accurate and up to date information, it's always advised to check the government website for the country in question.

Additional UDI resources

Looking for more information? You can visit our EUDAMED resource center, where you will find videos and resources to help you plan for UDI requirements in Europe. In addition, you may enjoy our blog post that outlines our views on the recent EUDAMED timeline updates.

For a broader introduction to UDI, see our Rimsys UDI Overview blog post.

If you're looking for an automated, integrated solution to help you meet changing regulations and manage your global UDI program, request a custom Rimsys demo!

MedTech
Blogs

Why a RIM System is Critical to Successfully Support MedTech M&A Activities

By

Kelly Riedel

February 7, 2025

4 min read

There was significant M&A activity in the MedTech sector in 2024, and the industry is predicting another big year for mergers and acquisitions. As MedTech companies aim to expand their product lines, enter new markets, innovate faster, and remain competitive in a rapidly evolving space, mergers and acquisitions can be attractive and cost-efficient options. Additionally, some manufacturers are choosing to divest parts of their business to hone their focus, drive additional investment in other key areas, and optimize operations.  

For the regulatory affairs professional, M&A activities can be anything but efficient. An influx of new products, registrations, and regulatory information to maintain can wreak havoc on RA teams who are already struggling to effectively manage and maintain compliance amid a seemingly constant state of regulatory change.  

In an increasingly complex regulatory landscape, many MedTech teams are turning to RIM systems to help them centralize regulatory information across the business, automate time-consuming, manual processes, and strengthen global compliance. These benefits are even more palpable for companies undergoing mergers, acquisitions, and divestitures, giving them streamlined, fully visible regulatory information management that can scale with their evolving business needs and additional regulatory information to manage.  

Case Study: Large, Publicly Traded Device Manufacturer Navigates Product Line Divestiture with Ease

A large, publicly traded manufacturer of products for pain management, digestive health, and IV therapy was in the process of divesting one of its product lines to another company. As a result, some of their regulatory employees were transitioned to the company that purchased its product line. The customer leveraged Rimsys’ unique Linked Accounts feature, which allows users to grant external stakeholders controlled access to Rimsys, to give those impacted access to the 100+ registrations associated with the divested products. As a result, the transitioned employees lost no access to their respective products and are able to manage, review, and approve those registrations as they normally would.  

“Linked Accounts is a fantastic feature that I didn’t originally appreciate as much. Rimsys made it easy for us to identify the products impacted by the divestiture and provide access to those who need them. It has been a bright spot in the sea of headaches both teams are experiencing when trying to review and approve information in other systems.”

-Program Manager, Regulatory Information Management

When the transaction is complete, the customer will easily be able to export the list of registrations by product tag and archive the registrations in Rimsys for easy management and visibility. The transitioned employees will also still retain access to the information they need in Rimsys as they work to implement their own Rimsys solution to manage those registrations.

Navigating Business and Regulatory Changes with RIM Systems

As the MedTech industry prepares for additional mergers, acquisitions, and divestitures this year, getting a solid regulatory information foundation in place is critical for a successful transition and ongoing compliance. Yet, many MedTech RA teams are using manual processes and siloed systems to manage regulatory information.

One of Rimsys’ goals is to serve as a strategic partner to MedTech RA teams, helping them better understand their current RIM state and the steps they need to advance their processes. This includes the implementation of a RIM system such as Rimsys to centralize their regulatory information, enable easy collaboration with internal and external stakeholders, and automate time-consuming manual processes for strengthened global compliance.  

See our Guide to MedTech RIM Maturity, which provides our RIM Maturity Model Framework, for ways to better assess your organization’s current RIM state and incrementally reach new milestones.  

Rimsys has helped global MedTech leaders navigate business and regulatory change with unified RIM software that provides full visibility into their regulatory activities. If you’re looking to stay ahead of upcoming strategic activities or are simply looking for a better way to manage your information amid increasing complexity, contact us to learn how Rimsys can help you streamline and automate your processes for long-term success.

‍

MedTech
RIM
Blogs

Rimsys POV: Updated EUDAMED timeline

By

Adam Price

January 28, 2025

4 min read

The EU Commission has recently announced updates for completing and implementing EUDAMED based on amendment 2024/1860. This article outlines the current EUDAMED timelines and our point of view on these timelines to help industry prepare accordingly.

Current EUDAMED Timelines:

  • The target date for the first mandatory application of functional EUDAMED modules is still January 1, 2026. The Vigilance module is expected to be mandatory beginning in Q3 2026 with full EUDAMED functionality planned for Q2 2027.
  • The Actor, UDI & Devices, Certificates, and Market Surveillance modules are currently under audit. The independent Minimum Viable Product (MVP) audit is intended to assess and confirm functionality and interconnectivity of the modules that are deemed audit ready. This audit is foreseen to be completed by Q2 2025.
  • Mandatory use of each module is to commence six (6) months after the module is declared fully functional through the independent audit and publication in the Official Journal of the European Union (OJEU). The Actor, UDI & Devices, Certificates, and Market Surveillance modules are expected to be declared fully functional at the end of Q2 2025, leading to their mandatory application date of January 1, 2026.
    ‍
  • The Actor, UDI & Devices, Certificates, and Market Surveillance modules are expected to be declared fully functional by the end of Q2 2025 and mandatory for industry use on January 1, 2026.
  • The Vigilance module is not part of the ongoing MVP audit and will not be declared fully functional along with the previously mentioned modules.  The revised timeline indicates that the audit of that module will occur between Q2 and Q3 of 2025, with the goal of the mandatory application date in Q2 of 2026.
    ‍
  • The development of the Clinical Investigation/Performance Studies (“CI/PS”) module is intended to continue through Q3 2026.  An audit to assess the CI/PS module together with the other five (5) modules will be completed once the CI/PS MVP has been developed.

‍


Photo courtesy of the
European Commission


Here is how Rimsys views the impact of this announcement for each stakeholder group:

Rimsys 

UDI is front of mind as well as future interaction with the Vigilance module. There is no change to our current plans, as Rimsys will continue to develop UDI and Post Market Surveillance functionality regardless of the updated target dates. We also recognize the potential impact of establishing data transfer (DTX) capabilities to interact with EUDAMED in a machine-to-machine (M2M) capacity. With the publication of the final requirements needed for M2M DTX to EUDAMED, Rimsys is positioned to finalize our connection and deliver M2M capabilities as part of the EUDAMED solution.

Industry/customer

Since the European Commission(EC) has made multiple updates to EUDAMED timelines, we expect industry will have some reluctance to accept the new target dates. As a result, this could delay re-engagement with EUDAMED preparations. However, we do not expect the EC to push these updated timelines. Manufacturers that don’t have a plan to submit data to EUDAMED by Q2 this year should expect significant challenges to meet these deadlines. With the audit of expected modules underway with the associated technical documentation published, Rimsys recommends taking steps to organize regulatory data now and submit their information early to all available EUDAMED modules.

EU Commission

The EC strongly recommends industry continues to establish its solution and to submit data on a voluntary basis. Do not wait. The commission’s position is that submitting data early will give companies an advantage by having their data “in” before the onslaught of the entire global MedTech industry, all trying to add data at the same time EUDAMED becomes mandatory. These companies will also be in front of the line to work with the commission resources if data submission issues occur.


Adam Price has over 20 years of medical device industry experience as a quality assurance and regulatory affairs professional. As Director of Regulatory and Technical Programs at Rimsys, Adam is responsible for the strategy, development, and implementation of all regulatory and technical programs supporting digital transformation of the Medtech industry with the Rimsys platform. Prior to joining Rimsys, Adam was the Head of Post Market Surveillance & Service Quality at Philips Healthcare. While at Philips, he focused on the development of post-market strategies and solutions to meet the changing regulatory and technical demands of the global market. Adam holds a Bachelor of Science in Mechanical Engineering and a Master of Business Administration (MBA) from the University of Pittsburgh.

‍

* Note - this article includes regulatory interpretations and opinions from the Rimsys team. We try to be as informative as possible, but this information isn’t intended to serve as a substitute for official guidance from regulatory authorities.

‍

MedTech
Blogs

Using EUDAMED as the Foundation for a Global UDI Strategy

By

Adam Price

January 16, 2025

4 min read

If your company is selling medical devices in the European Union, you’re likely thinking about EUDAMED. If you’re not, it's time to start. Come January 2026, medical device manufacturers will be required to submit their UDI data to EUDAMED. EUDAMED’s data requirements and interconnectivity are complex. Not only is it easy to underestimate the time it will take to organize and verify UDI data, but many manufacturers are still using manual processes such as spreadsheets or internally built systems to manage this information. And with a number of organizations treating UDI data management and submission as an IT or supply chain process, some RA teams don’t even know where their UDI data is.

Getting your UDI data EUDAMED ready for submission by January 2026 is going to take some time, but there is a tremendous opportunity amidst the extensive preparation. With a little bit of foresight, RA teams can position the data output of their EUDAMED compliance project as the foundation for a global UDI program. Here are some reasons why using EUDAMED as the primary building block for a global UDI strategy will enable long-term success:

The product data needed for EUDAMED can be applied to current and future global UDI requirements

With many required data attributes and Basic UDI family groupings, establishing EUDAMED compliance for UDI is going to take some careful planning, detailed organization of current data, and careful consideration of your regulatory strategy for the European market.  Many manufacturers need to start with the basics: locating current UDI data to understand how it is currently managed and transmitted to the respective regulatory bodies. This process is also going to require an assessment of your UDI data. Do you have information populated for all of the required attributes?Is this information current and accurate? Finding answers to these questions is going to take thoughtful collaboration among all stakeholders, but it’s also going to set your organization up with a solid data foundation that will help you meet additional market requirements.

It’s going to require an audit of your people, processes, and systems

Industry is focused on establishing UDI data in EUDAMED to align with current requirements for timing but transmitting your UDI interaction with EUDAMED is not a one-time process as it may be currently treated for other regulators. New devices, device changes, UDI data updates, and commercial availability may require EUDAMED updates or establishing new UDI profiles altogether.  Are your current processes able to support you long-term? Manual processes are going to make it nearly impossible to keep pace and compliance, and internally built systems are going to require regular validation and subject matter expertise to keep up with evolving requirements and EUDAMED version updates. Taking the time to make sure you have the proper expertise and systems to maintain EUDAMED compliance will more easily allow you to scale your UDI management as your business grows and the regulatory landscape evolves.

The risks of non-compliance are too steep to ignore

Those who fail to submit UDI data to EUDAMED in line with the required timelines are at risk of audit findings, financial penalties, product delays, and worst of all, having to remove products from the market. Not only does product removal have lasting productivity, competitive, and economic impacts on the manufacturer, but it also decreases the availability of life-changing medical devices to end users. These risks are simply too significant to ignore and necessitate a comprehensive global compliance strategy that can meet the needs for EUDAMED and additional countries as global regulations change.

Additional regulators are establishing UDI requirements and big data technologies

As the value of UDI is recognized, More global markets are adopting UDI requirements to enhance the traceability of their devices and improve patient safety. For instance, Australia has established UDI requirements with mandatory compliance for data submission expected in the summer of 2025. Additionally, Rimsys expects the competent authorities from Switzerland and the United Kingdom to adopt their own UDI requirements following their exit from the European Union. Even though each regulator has varying requirements to some degree, organizing product data to meet EUDAMED’s robust set of data attributes and requirements will put you in a position to more easily meet additional global UDI requirements.

How Rimsys supports a global UDI strategy‍

Both the regulatory and technology requirements for UDI continue to grow in complexity. Rimsys has an integrated, automated UDI solution that provides medical device manufacturers the ability to manage their UDI data alongside their regulatory activities for total visibility and control.  

Not only does Rimsys have the expertise necessary to help MedTech manufacturers navigate UDI data and transmission to EUDAMED for January 2026, but we're also dedicated to supporting MedTech companies with solutions and strategies that go beyond EUDAMED compliance to support a scalable and efficient global UDI program to meet the needs of evolving regulatory requirements. Rimsys provides MedTech manufacturers with a single-sourced UDI solution that allows them to manage their UDI data and status alongside regulatory activities.

Our novel Universal UDI® approach centrally stores common data attributes across global markets for simple management, reduced compliance risk, and increased efficiency. Using data established in Rimsys for EUDAMED as a baseline, we’re enabling MedTech companies to more easily meet additional global UDI requirements in a unified RIM solution that applies these common attributes between various market requirements (with more coming soon!):

Rimsys Universal UDI® approach

Ready to increase your team’s efficiency and compliance with integrated and automated UDI management to support your long-term goals? Request a custom Rimsys UDI demo here!

‍

‍

MedTech
Blogs

Assessing RIM Maturity: Takeaways from our Expert Panel

By

Bethaney Lentz

December 17, 2024

4 min read

Rimsys recently hosted a webinar, Assessing RIM Maturity for Your Regulatory Management Strategy, to help RA teams put together a practical RIM transformation plan for their MedTech company. Featuring industry leaders, Adrian Bishop of Boston Scientific, Brian Williams of KPMG, Steve Gens of Gens Associates, and James Gianoutsos of Rimsys, the discussion centered on the evolving MedTech regulatory information management (RIM) landscape, using the RIM Maturity Model Framework to guide your regulatory information management strategy, a RIM maturity case study, and AI’s role in regulatory information management. Here's a quick recap of the insights we discussed:  
‍‍

The Growing Need for MedTech RIM Modernization

The session underscored the increasing complexity of global regulatory requirements in the MedTech sector. From EU MDR to the adoption of EUDAMED, the shifting regulatory environment is pushing companies to modernize their RIM processes to ensure compliance and avoid operational inefficiencies. Steve Gens shared key insights from his 2024 World Class RIM Study research that by 2024, 52% of life sciences companies had fully adopted global RIM programs, a significant leap from 32% in 2022. However, many MedTech organizations remain in the early stages of RIM maturity, reflecting the need for process harmonization and robust digital solutions.  
‍

“The manual nature of spreadsheets and desktop authoring tools is no longer sustainable with all the different regulations and the global operating model that most companies have where you're trying to quickly get submissions out to different markets and then have to keep track of where your products are registered and where there are renewals, and where there are expiration dates. Having that information in informal spreadsheets and SharePoint sites is really not sustainable and creates a lot of compliance risks." - Brian Williams, KPMG‍

‍

The RIM Maturity Model: A Framework for Transformation Progress

Our panel also explored the new RIM Maturity Model framework from Rimsys, which was built to help MedTech teams modernize their processes no matter where they are in their transformation journey.

“MedTech teams want to modernize their processes but don't know where to start from a business or data collection standpoint. They don't have a framework that takes their current processes into account." - James Gianoutsos, Rimsys

The RIM Maturity Model categorizes organizations into six levels based on their current regulatory information management processes:

  • Level 0 - Unaware
  • Level 1 – Aware
  • Level 2 – Reactive
  • Level 3 – Proactive
  • Level 4 – Well Managed
  • Level 5 – Optimized

Most MedTech teams fall between Levels 0 and 2, relying on siloed data and manual processes and reactive regulatory information management. Progressing toward higher maturity levels involves:  

  • Data Harmonization: Establishing consistent definitions and processes across business units.  ‍
  • Process Transformation: Moving beyond "firefighting" modes to proactive regulatory planning.  ‍
  • Technology Adoption: Implementing a RIM system that centralizes data, automates tasks, and facilitates cross-functional alignment. This is a critical step to reaching fully optimized regulatory information management.  
“If you're considering a RIM adoption or are already going through one, make sure you understand your own expectations. You can't get to a spacecraft without without getting into a horse and buggy, Data collection and harmonization is milestone-driven and progression-based. You're not going to get to an optimized state on Day 1. But as long as you keep continuing to make well-informed decisions with your data and aligning internally on key terms in that data digitization processes, you will… get there." - James Gianoutsos, Rimsys
"As you're progressing, you need to be really thoughtful about the cost benefit of any initiatives that you're undertaking, Make sure that you have clear objectives that can be measured and that you can report value against and really just make sure that you create recognition with your management teams and with your operational teams that this is going to be a phased journey. You're not going to get there overnight and set expectations appropriately, but try to make measurable steps along the way. And as you do that, you start to build confidence, you build awareness and you build trust that you're delivering on the kind of the objectives that you set out to deliver. It's really a journey.” - Brian Williams, KPMG

‍

Case Study: RIM Maturity Lessons from Boston Scientific

Adrienne Bishop from Boston Scientific shared her company’s journey toward RIM maturity. After previous attempts to implement global systems, the team learned to prioritize readiness, secure buy-in from stakeholders, and leverage external expertise.

“The added benefit of a MedTech solution is also that with these external partners, we can understand what is industry standard and that can help us with our change management.” -Adrienne Bishop, Boston Scientific

Key lessons they learned include:  

  • Start with Data: Define data fields clearly and cross-check sources to ensure accuracy.
  • ‍Limit Customization: Avoid over-customizing solutions that can hinder transformation; instead, adopt proven industry-standard processes.  ‍
  • Invest in Change Management: Equip teams with the skills and mindset to embrace transformation.  

Boston Scientific’s phased approach—beginning with foundational product registration data and expanding capabilities over time—demonstrates the importance of incremental progress. Boston Scientific, for example, has made strides in adopting a RIM system by focusing on transformation rather than harmonization alone, emphasizing the importance of cross-department collaboration and clear data governance.  

"The solution we picked works for other people, so we can make it work for us. We also realized that what we were doing before maybe wasn't wrong, but it was definitely inefficient. We now have different inputs and different regulations. And now we need to change to get there." - Adrienne Bishop, Boston Scientific


AI and Automation in RIM


The panel distinguished the key differences between automation and AI, noting that while automation focuses on rule-based processes, AI serves as a good starting point for handling complex, abstract tasks. While AI can reduce time spent on tasks, it’s important for RA teams to verify the source information and the outputs for accuracy.  

“There's a lot of anxiety about really what AI will deliver. But I think a lot of people that have been working with it, they see it as the virtual assistant or assisting. So it's more augmentation because there's a lot of concern.” - Steve Gens, Gens and Associates

Both automation and AI are important to regulatory modernization. Specific use cases include:  
‍

  • Automation: Streamlining data ingestion, workflows, and compliance monitoring.  ‍
  • AI: Mining historical regulatory data, collecting regulatory research, and enhancing regulatory intelligence.  ‍‍

Despite the attention around AI, the panel emphasized that its effectiveness hinges on high-quality, harmonized data. Poor data foundations can render even the most advanced AI tools ineffective, highlighting the need for a phased, data-first approach to digital transformation.

“There are some benefits you can definitely achieve with AI. But first and foremost data is going to be the most challenging yet the most effective way to get to that holy grail that I think everybody wants out of a regulatory information management system.” - James Gianoutsos, Rimsys

‍

Looking Ahead: The Future of RIM As the MedTech industry advances

Achieving higher levels of RIM maturity will require strategic investment in technology, data, and talent. Organizations must treat RIM modernization as a holistic transformation, integrating robust processes and aligning cross-functional teams.  With automation poised to play an increasingly significant role, companies that prioritize data governance and process maturity today will be well-positioned to leverage advanced technologies like AI tomorrow.  

RIM modernization is not just a compliance imperative but a competitive advantage. By adopting a structured maturity model, focusing on data quality, and embracing RIM solutions like Rimsys, MedTech organizations can streamline regulatory processes, reduce risk, and drive innovation.  If your organization is considering RIM modernization, now is the time to assess where you stand and take the first steps toward a holistic transformation.

For more insights, listen to the webinar recording here!

MedTech
RIM
Blogs

5 Reasons It’s Time to Stop Managing Your UDI Data in Spreadsheets

By

Bethaney Lentz

December 5, 2024

4 min read


UDI data management is continuously getting more complex. Not only do global markets have varying UDI requirements, but new markets are expected to come online in the coming months. Additionally, the mandatory application of EUDAMED will begin in January of 2026, meaning that MedTech manufacturers selling products in the European Union will have to submit their UDI information to EUDAMED.  

Submitting UDI information to EUDAMED will require careful and thorough preparation to ensure that manufacturers have all of the required data attributes necessary to meet the EU’s requirements and that they have a strategy in place to organize, review, and submit all of their information.  

MedTech regulatory affairs processes are largely manual and siloed, and UDI management is no different. Many teams are still managing their UDI data in complex spreadsheets. While the forthcoming mandatory EUDAMED requirements have prompted many manufacturers to start planning more comprehensive UDI strategies, managing a high volume of UDI data in spreadsheets is unsustainable long term.  

Efficient and scalable UDI management requires deep expertise, collaboration, and full visibility into your products’ global regulatory activities that spreadsheets simply can’t match. Here are 5 reasons it’s time to move away from managing your UDI data in spreadsheets:

1. They’re setting you up for compliance risks

UDI management involves a high volume of data across different markets and regulator IT systems. Not only are the assembly and maintenance of those data in a spreadsheet prone to human error, but they don’t enable the regulatory expertise necessary to ensure that your requirements for each applicable market are up to date.  Further, siloed spreadsheets aren’t connected to systems that help you unlock regulatory insights. The responsibility is yours to make sure your spreadsheet has current, accurate, and reliable information.  

With cumbersome version history and change tracking (or lack thereof), spreadsheets also lack the traceability needed for audits, making it difficult and time-consuming for MedTech companies to effectively demonstrate compliance. This not only adds time to the audit, but opens your organization up for audit findings, financial penalties, product delays, and revenue loss.  

2. They’re time-consuming and difficult to manage

When multiplying the markets you’re selling in by the number of products you’re selling, it’s easy to see how complex UDI spreadsheets can get. Since there’s no automation to ensure the attributes and data in your spreadsheet are up to date, it’s up to you to validate it periodically and research the updated requirements. If you do establish a process to validate that UDI data, this adds critical time for Medtech teams that are already tasked to execute faster with limited team members.  If you do not periodically validate UDI data, you take on an increased risk of non-compliance.  

Additionally, new market regulatory and IT requirements make managing UDI information even more difficult each time a new market is added. With several countries expected to mandate or enact new UDI requirements and systems over the next couple of years, the complexity is only going to grow with time.  

3. They limit collaboration across your team

Multiple stakeholders working within the same spreadsheet can easily create confusion. Not only is it difficult to track changes, but there’s a likelihood of overwriting critical information. This can not only lead to the compliance risks mentioned above, but spreadsheets also impact your team’s ability to effectively collaborate. Team members often duplicate the spreadsheet and work off of different versions when there are limited controls in place to prevent this from happening.  

On a strategic level, spreadsheets impact your team’s ability to share knowledge with one another. There’s no way to effectively share detailed notes and tasks, and there’s also limited functionality to track transmission status and troubleshoot transmission errors with your team.  

4. They don’t provide full visibility into your products’ selling statuses

UDI spreadsheets are usually designed for one purpose, UDI data management. However, UDI is just one facet of obtaining market clearance for your product. The product must also be approved and registered in each respective market. Many manufacturers have multiple teams and spreadsheets to track regulatory activities where UDI responsibilities may lie outside of the regulatory team.  This approach limits their ability to get full visibility into the status of their products and integrate this information with other relevant applications across the business. With regulatory information scattered and siloed, it’s easy to miss the connection between UDI data and upcoming expirations and renewals.

5. They don’t easily scale with your business and growing market requirements

As you create new products and bring existing ones into new markets, do you have a plan in place to help you scale effectively? The regulatory activities along with the expanding UDI requirements associated with new product introductions and market expansions are high enough, and spreadsheets simply can’t keep pace with business growth.  

Moving your UDI management off spreadsheets is going to set you up for a successful, long-term UDI program. MedTech companies not only need to be aware of the forthcoming mandatory EUDAMED application timelines, but they also need a sustainable solution as additional UDI requirements come online. Finding a solution that’s built with the complexities of UDI data management in mind, automates time-consuming, manual processes, and offers complete visibility into all of your regulatory activities is going to help you ensure that your UDI program is compliant and scalable to meet your evolving business needs.  

The Rimsys RIM platform allows you to manage your UDI program in a single-sourced, unified, and connected solution that enables you to track your UDI activities alongside your product registrations and selling status to give you confidence in your compliance. Additionally, Rimsys has a novel Universal UDI approach that captures common attributes across various market requirements to reduce administrative burden and help you submit your UDI information consistently and with ease.  

Want to see how a purpose-built MedTech RIM solution can offer you a compliant, scalable, and comprehensive approach to UDI management? Request a demo to see Rimsys in action!

‍

MedTech
I agree to the privacy policy including to Rimsys using my contact details to contact me for marketing purposes.
Thank you! Your submission has been received!
Oops! Something went wrong while submitting the form.
Hand holding smartphone showing email app with 12 unread messages notification.