Featured
Rimsys Announces Rimsys AI to Eliminate Repetitive Tasks and Enhance Decision-Making for MedTech Regulatory Teams
Rimsys, the leading Regulatory Information Management (RIM) platform for the MedTech industry, today announced the launch of Rimsys AI, a suite of embedded artificial intelligence (AI) agents.
The beginner's guide to the FDA De Novo classification process
This article is an excerpt from The beginner's guide to the FDA De Novo classification process ebook.
Contents
- Introduction
- Chapter 1: What is an FDA De Novo request?
- Chapter 2: Contents of a De Novo request
- Chapter 3: Submitting a De Novo request
- Appendix A: Acceptance review checklist
Congratulations, you have successfully developed a new medical device! Now you need to take it to market. Normally in the United States this would mean completing a 510(k) submission. However, the 510(k) relies on “substantial equivalence”—a comparison to a similar device already on the market (also called a predicate device) to assess the risk profile of the new device. What if your device is totally new, and there isn’t a similar device to compare it to? Enter the FDA De Novo process. The De Novo process provides a pathway to market for novel devices with a low to medium risk profile.
What does De Novo mean?
According to the Merriman-Webster dictionary, de novo is a Latin word meaning “as if for the first time; or anew.” Perfectly fitting that the FDA uses this term “De Novo” to describe market approval requests for new medical devices or technology where there is no comparable predicate device on the market.
The Food and Drug Administration Modernization Act of 1996 provided the FDA with the authority to create the De Novo Classification Process. It's a process that uses a risk-based strategy for a new, novel kind of medical device, in vitro diagnostic, or medical software solution whose type has previously not been identified and/or classified. It’s a process by which a novel medical device can be classified as a Class I or Class II device, instead of being automatically classified as Class III, which may not be appropriate. Before the implementation of the De Novo process in 1997, all the “not substantially equivalent” (NSE) products were required to be initially classified as a Class III device. But for a lot of devices, this risk class didn’t really make sense. The De Novo process provides a pathway for more accurate classifications of novel, lower-risk devices.
October, 2021, the FDA released a final guidance document "De Novo Classification Process (Evaluation of Automatic Class III Designation)" to provide guidance to the requester (also known as the manufacturer) and the FDA on the process for the submission and review of a De Novo Classification Request under section 513(f)(2) of the Federal Food, Drug, and Cosmetic Act (the FD&C Act). This process provides a pathway to an initial Class I or Class II risk classification for medical devices for which general controls or general and special controls, provide a reasonable assurance of safety and effectiveness, but for which there is no legally marketed predicate device. This guidance document replaced the "New Section 513(f)(2) – Evaluation of Automatic Class III Designation, Guidance for Industry and CDRH Staff" document, dated February 19, 1998.
Consistent with the final rule, the FDA updated the guidance documents below to provide recommendations for submitting De Novo requests, as well as criteria and procedures for accepting, withdrawing, reviewing, and making decisions on De Novo requests, effective January 3, 2022.
- User Fees and Refunds for De Novo Classification Requests
- FDA and Industry Actions on De Novo Classification Requests: Effect on FDA Review clock and Goals
- Acceptance Review for De Novo Classification Requests
The 510(k) and the De Novo processes are similar in that they are both pathways to market for medical devices with low to moderate risk, which is Class I and Class II. The biggest difference between the two is that the 510(k) heavily relies on the concept of "substantial equivalence" to an existing medical device. You must prove this to get the clearance of your 510(k) submission. In the De Novo process, there isn’t a product currently on the market that is “substantially equivalent” to yours, so it’s like starting with a clean slate. For more on the 510(k) process, see our Beginner’s Guide to the 510(k) ebook.
A result of the De Novo process to be aware of is that a successful submission will lead to a new predicate device type that someone else can reference to bring their product to market through the 510(k) process. You’ve done all the work, so now it’s available for anyone to use to provide "substantial equivalence".
De Novo history/timeline
Preparing a De Novo request
1. Do your research! Be sure to complete all the necessary research prior to your submission. You want to be sure that your device is not substantially equivalent to an existing device. Resources to review include:
- The Center for Devices and Radiological Health (CDRH)
- U.S. FDA Device Classification Database
- Device Classification Under Section 513(f)(2)(De Novo)
2. A De Novo request can be submitted with or without a preceding 510(k). There are two options for when you can submit a De Novo request:
Option A: After receiving a not substantially equivalent (NSE) determination (that is, no predicate, new intended use, or different technological characteristics that raise different questions of safety and effectiveness) in response to a 510(k) submission.
Option B: If you’ve determined, after extensive research, that there is no legally marketed device on which to base a determination of substantial equivalence.
3. Be sure all fees are paid to the FDA in advance of submitting a De Novo request. The FDA’s fiscal year begins in October and runs through the following September. Fees have increased each year since they were introduced, but the FDA’s percentage of reviews completed within the 150-day window has increased as well.
A business that is qualified and certified as a “small business” is eligible for a substantial reduction in most of the FDA user fees, including De Novo. The CDRH is responsible for the Small Business Program that determines whether a business is qualified.
Medical Device User Fee Amendments (MDUFA) guidance documents can provide more detailed information about all FDA user fees.
4. The initial request process serves only to determine if the De Novo request is administratively acceptable based upon the Acceptance Checklist. The initial acceptance is followed by substantive review which will determine the final risk classification of your device.
5. A Pre-Submission (Pre-Sub) is a formal written request for feedback from the FDA that is provided in formal written form, and then followed by a meeting. Although a Pre-Sub is not required prior to a De Novo request, it can be extremely helpful to receive early feedback, especially for devices that have not previously been reviewed under a 510(k). If you think you would like to submit a pre-sub first, there are suggested guidelines for submission you should consider:
- Describe your rationale for a Class I or Class II classification for your device.
- Provide the search results of FDA public databases and other resources used to determine that no legally marketed device and no classification for the same device type exists.
- Provide a list of regulations and/or product codes that may be relevant.
- Provide a rationale for why the subject device does not fit within and/or is different from any identified classification regulations, based on available information.
- Identify each health risk associated with the device and the reason for each risk.
- Briefly describe any ongoing and/or planned protocols/studies that need to be completed in order to collect the necessary data to establish the device’s risk profile.
- Provide information regarding the safety and effectiveness of the device. Cite the types of valid scientific evidence you anticipate providing in your De Novo request, including types of data/studies relating to the device’s safety and effectiveness.
- Briefly describe any ongoing and/or planned protocols/studies that need to be completed to collect the necessary safety and effectiveness data.
- Provide protocols for non-clinical and clinical studies (if applicable), including how they will address the risks you anticipate and targeted performance levels that will demonstrate that general controls or general and special controls are sufficient to provide reasonable assurance of safety and effectiveness.
- Share any proposed mitigation measure(s)/control(s) for each risk, based on the best available information at the time of the submission. Highlight which mitigations are general controls and which are special controls and provide details on each.
- Include any other risks that may be applicable, in addition to those identified in the Pre-Sub, given the indications for use for the device.
- If applicable, provide any controls that should be considered to provide a reasonable assurance of safety and effectiveness for the device.
- Provide any non-clinical study protocols that are sufficient to allow the collection of data from which conclusions about device safety and/or effectiveness can be drawn. These protocols should address whether the identified level of concern is the appropriate level of concern for the device software, and if any additional biocompatibility and/or sterility testing is required.
- If clinical data is needed, provide information to show that the proposed study design and selected control groups are appropriate?
6. The FDA will attempt to review the De Novo request submission within 15 calendar days of receipt of the request to make a determination that the submission is declined or accepted for review. If they are unable to complete the review within the 15 days, your submission will automatically move to “accepted for review” status. https://www.fda.gov/regulatory-information/search-fda-guidance-documents/de-novo-classification-process-evaluation-automatic-class-iii-designation
7. There are times when the FDA will refund your application fee. They have created a guidance document “User Fees and Refunds for De Novo Classification Requests” for the purpose of identifying:
- the types of De Novo requests subject to user fees
- exceptions to user fees
- the actions that may result in refunds of user fees that have been paid
When is a De Novo request subject to a user fee?
When will the FDA refund a De Novo user fee?
What fee must be paid for a new device submission following a De Novo “decline” determination?
To continue reading this eBook including a detailed walk-through of all the Traditional 510(k) components, submission requirements and timelines, and an overview of the other 510(k) forms including the Abbreviated 510(k) and the Special 510(k), please register to download the full version.
The ultimate guide to the medical device single audit program (MDSAP)
This article is an excerpt from The ultimate guide to the medical device single audit program (MDSAP) ebook.
Table of contents
- What is MDSAP?
- History of MDSAP
- Who is responsible for the MDSAP?
- How does an MDSAP audit work?
- Audit sequence
- You got a nonconformity – now what?
- What does an MDSAP audit cost?
- Why choose the MDSAP certification process?
- Potential disadvantages of the MDSAP
- Ready to participate? – Here’s how to get started
- Completing a successful MDSAP audit
The Medical Device Single Audit Program (MDSAP) was designed and developed to allow a single audit of a medical device manufacturer to be applied to all country markets whose regulatory authorities are members of the program. The MDSAP provides efficient and thorough coverage of the standard requirements for medical device manufacturer quality management systems, and requirements for regulatory purposes (ISO 13485:2016). In addition, there are specific requirements of each medical device regulatory authority participating in the MDSAP that must be met:
- Conformity Assessment Procedures of the Australian Therapeutic Goods (Medical Devices) Regulations (TG(MD)R Sch3)
- Brazilian Good Manufacturing Practices (RDC ANVISA 16)
- Medical Device Regulations of Health Canada (ISO 13485:2003)
- Japan Ordinance on Standards for Manufacturing Control and Quality Control of Medical Devices and In Vitro Diagnostic Reagents (MHLW Ministerial Ordinance No 169)
- Quality System Regulation (21 CFR Part 820), and specific requirements of medical device regulatory authorities participating in the MDSAP program.
This means that a report from a single MDSAP audit of a medical device manufacturer would be accepted as a substitute for routine inspections by all the member Regulatory Authorities (RAs) across the world. There are currently five participating Regulatory Authorities (RA) representing the following countries: Australia, Brazil, Canada, Japan and the USA.
In April, 2021, the RAs released an “Audit Approach” document (MDSAP AU P0002.006) that combines the formerly separate MDSAP Audit Model and Process Companion documents into a single guidance document. It includes guidance for assessing the conformity of each process and includes an audit sequence, instructions for auditing each specific process, and identifies links that highlight the interactions between the processes.
In March 2012 the US FDA announced that they had approved a final pilot guidance document “Guidance for Industry, Third Parties and Food and Drug Administration Staff: Medical Device ISO 13485:2003 Voluntary Audit Report Submission Pilot Program.” This allowed the owner or operator of a medical device manufacturing facility to be removed from FDA’s routine inspection work plan for 1 year upon completing a ISO 13485:2003 audit. This guidance document went into effect in June 2012, and was intended as an interim measure while a single audit program was being developed.
This pilot program was not very successful and few companies signed up because they did not see any advantage in participating. The manufacturer had to pay for a third party to inspect their facilities, generate a report, and share the inspection results back to the FDA. Many companies were reluctant to contract “someone else” to perform their inspection when they could easily wait for the FDA to conduct an inspection for free.
During its inaugural meeting in Singapore in 2012, the International Medical Device Regulators Forum (IMDRF) appointed a working group to develop a set of documents for a harmonized third-party auditor system. Hence, the “Medical Device Single Audit Program” (MDSAP) was formed. The concept was similar to the FDA’s original idea of creating a third-party auditor to help reduce their workload of performing regulatory audits of medical device manufacturers’ quality management systems. This new approach would consist of a single audit that would review regulatory QMS compliance, conducted by a third-party, who would later be called an Auditing Organization (AO).
From January 2014 to December 2016, five countries participated in a Medical Device Single Audit Program Pilot. In June 2017, a report was generated summarizing the outcomes of prospective “proof- of-concept” criteria established to confirm the success of the program. The outcomes are documented in the final MDSAP Pilot Report and recommended that the program become fully active and open to any manufacturer who requested this type of audit.
The governing body of the MDSAP is the Regulatory Authority Council (RAC), which is composed of two senior managers (and a few other staff members) from each participating RA. They are responsible for executive planning, strategic priorities, setting policy, and making decisions on behalf of the MDSAP International Consortium. The RAC also reviews and approves documents, procedures, work instructions, and more. The mission of the MDSAP International Consortium is to jointly leverage regulatory resources to manage an efficient, effective, and sustainable single audit program focused on the oversight of medical device manufacturers on a global scale.
Other international partners that are involved in the MDSAP include:
MDSAP Observers:
- European Union (EU)
- United Kingdom’s Medicines and Healthcare products Regulatory Agency (MHRA)
- The World Health Organization (WHO) Prequalification of In Vitro Diagnostics (IVDs) Program
MDSAP Affiliate Members:
- Argentina’s National Administration of Drugs, Foods and Medical Devices (ANMAT)
- Republic of Korea’s Ministry of Food and Drug Safety
- Singapore’s Health Sciences Authority (HSA)
The observers and affiliate members are not the same as the participating member RA’s. The observers simply observe and/or contribute to RAC activities. Affiliate members, on the other hand, are interested in engaging in the MDSAP program and are subject to certain rules. They are only given access to a certain level of information about the manufacturers, audit dates, and information in audit reports.
They are also invited to attend sessions that are open to members, observers, and affiliates only.
Audits can also be conducted by MDSAP participating RAs at any time and for various reasons including:
- "For Cause" due to information obtained by the regulatory authority
- as a follow up to findings from a previous audit
- to confirm the effective implementation of the MDSAP requirements
The purpose of audits conducted by the RAs is to ensure appropriate oversight of the AOs MDSAP auditing activities. The AOs are appointed by the RAs and a list of the currently approved AO’s is published on the FDA website. Most AOs offer a broad range of management system certification services, beyond just medical devices. Manufacturers should verify that prospective AOs are clearly trained and perform MDSAP audits of medical devices.
AOs have the final word as to whether a manufacturer has met the requirements for the MDSAP during the execution of the audit and generation of the associated reports summarizing the results. MSDAP RAC participating RAs have the final decision regarding all development, implementation, maintenance, and expansion activities associated with the program.
Although an unannounced visit by an AO is rare, it can happen in circumstances where high-grade nonconformities have been detected.
To continue reading this eBook including a detailed look at the MDSAP audit process and grading, pros and cons of the approach, and how to get started please register to download the full version.
Rimsys releases new automated unique device identification (UDI) module for its holistic medtech RIM platform
Rimsys, a world-leading Regulatory Information Management (RIM) software platform for medical technology companies, announced the release of an innovative and automated solution to address the global Unique Device Identification (UDI) requirements. This enhancement to the Rimsys ecosystem is immediately available to new and existing customers, providing a compliant method for tracking and traceability of UDI data that is fully compatible with global health authority databases.
UDI is a global harmonization effort to provide more consistent data that benefits overall product traceability throughout the medical device supply chain. It aims to adequately identify medical devices from manufacturing through distribution to patient use. Because global markets have different UDI requirements, product data can become a maintenance nightmare, even for the most mature medical technology companies. Data management is further complicated as UDI data is not static and must be updated based on changing regulatory requirements, such as market dates and registration status.
"Rimsys is the first automated UDI solution to fully integrate into a product’s registration lifecycle, ensuring that changing regulatory information is properly captured, registered, and maintained with the product and within government UDI databases like the GUDID (USA) and EUDAMED (EU)," said James Gianoutsos, Founder & President at Rimsys, "The current solutions landscape revolves around creating in-house, custom, and expensive projects with custom-built software or existing ERP software that were not designed to keep up with the fast-paced and ever-changing regulatory landscape."
In order to stay compliant and competitive, medical technology companies need to adapt quickly and flawlessly to the regulatory environment. As UDI requirements are rolled out across the globe, Rimsys’ UDI module seamlessly integrates with product registration data that is already actively managed within Rimsys, resulting in less maintenance, reduced costs, better compliance, and ultimately decreased time-to-market.
"We have already seen how our system has helped world-leading medical technology companies, such as Johnson & Johnson, Omron, and Terumo, digitize, automate, and navigate the global regulatory landscape,” said Brad Ryba, Chief Technology Officer at Rimsys, "As these requirements and demands continue to evolve, we are committed to ensuring that regulatory professionals can leverage the data integrations within Rimsys to more proactively manage their regulatory information."
Interested customers can schedule a preview of the new UDI module.
Rimsys named 2020 top technology company finalist by Tech 50 awards
Rimsys has been named a Finalist in Tech 50’s 2020 awards program hosted by the Pittsburgh Technology Council. The awards program, which was held November 12, 2020 at a virtual gala event, announced the winners and finalists. Rimsys was nominated as Innovator of the Year in the MedTech category, along with Sentact, Philips, and TeleTracking Technologies. In addition to the Company’s nomination, Rimsys’ Founder and CEO, James Gianoutsos, was nominated for CEO of the Year.
The awards program honors technology innovation in the region. Rimsys Inc., provider of the only holistic Regulatory Information Management (RIM) software for medtech is headquartered in Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania and was proud to be among the 2020 nominees. Rimsys was named a finalist this year, as Sentact, a provider of healthcare technology solutions for the patient care journey, walked away as the winner. Barbara VanKirk, CEO of IQ Inc., won this year’s CEO of the Year award.
"Rimsys is honored to be a finalist in both categories. Thank you to the Pittsburgh Technology Council for highlighting all of these innovative companies, and congratulations to this year’s winners," said Gianoutsos, "Rimsys is already used and trusted by leading companies, including Johnson & Johnson and Terumo, and we look forward to the near future where Rimsys’ automation of the global regulatory landscape is commonplace for medical technology companies and regulatory affairs professionals."
James Gianoutsos founded Rimsys in 2017, recognizing that while regulatory management platforms existed for pharmaceutical companies, medical technology companies face an entirely different set of challenges and requirements. Equipped with the expertise and drive to give regulatory affairs professionals a better way, he developed Rimsys: a RIM software built 100% for medtech companies.
Rimsys consolidates all the major functions of regulatory affairs on a 100% secure, cloud-based software, making product registration, standards management, essential principles/GSPR, and regulatory intelligence easy. Its newest integrated module manages global UDI requirements.
"It’s been an unparalleled year with unthinkable challenges," said Audrey Russo, President & CEO of the Pittsburgh Technology Council, "The COVID-19 Pandemic has tested everyone’s mettle in ways never imagined. This year’s Tech 50 is a testament to the fortitude, creativity, and innovation that exists across our industry, membership, and in every Tech 50 winner and finalist."
For a full list of finalists and winners, visit the Pittsburgh Technology Council’s website.
Rimsys secures $1.5 million to accelerate growth of its leading medtech regulatory information management platform
Rimsys Inc., provider of the leading Regulatory Information Management (“RIM”) software designed specifically for medical technology (“medtech”) companies, announced today it closed a $1.5 million investment round, led by Allos Ventures. The financing round will support Rimsys’ penetration of the medtech RIM market through planned expansions of its product offering, sales, and marketing execution. Rimsys serves an expanding list of enterprise customers, including industry leaders such as Johnson & Johnson and Terumo.
"Complex regulatory challenges create barriers that delay product time-to-market, stall revenue growth and increase exposure to compliance risks for even the most experienced medtech companies," said James Gianoutsos, founder & president of Rimsys. "Regulatory teams are in need of digital solutions that provide more efficient and compliant ways to stay on top of a constantly changing regulatory environment"
Rimsys’ solution seamlessly integrates with medtech manufacturers’ existing quality management systems, product lifecycle management systems, and sales and distribution software systems. Rimsys’ robust digital platform, with its intuitive user interface and global intelligence, enables its customers to meet market entrance requirements and grow internationally. John McIlwraith, managing director at Allos Ventures will join Rimsys’ board of directors.
"The maze of global regulations covering medical technology is growing more complex and frequently results in dead ends and delays that can greatly impact commercialization of these products," said McIlwraith. "This financing round will enable the company to further accelerate its momentum with large enterprise customers."
For more information on Rimsys, please visit www.rimsys.io.
Rimsys announces new brand identity for world-leading regulatory information management (RIM) software
Rimsys, a world-leading Regulatory Information Management (RIM) software platform for medical technology companies, announced a new brand identity and tagline. Rimsys, the only holistic RIM software on the market designed specifically for medical technology companies, with functionality for the pillars of regulatory affairs, rebranded to accurately reflect its novel and advanced offering through a distinct, modern brand identity and messaging platform.
The new visual identity, including logo, color palette, graphic elements, and iconography mirror the trusted, relatable, and modern personality of Rimsys. The colors, which feature a vibrant purple and dark blue, were strategically chosen to differentiate Rimsys from other RIM solutions on the market. The visuals are accompanied by a new mission statement, “to digitize, automate, and create regulatory order for the medical technology industry,” and messaging platform that conveys its value propositions:
- Used and trusted by the world’s leading medtech companies
- Built by and for regulatory affairs professionals in medtech
- Easy to start and simple to scale as your company grows
"We’re pleased to announce this rebrand to our customers and partners, with complete confidence that the new identity and messaging accurately reflect our enterprise software solution," said James Gianoutsos, Founder & President at Rimsys.
Rimsys consolidates all the major functions of regulatory affairs on a 100% secure, cloud-based software, making product registration, standards management, essential principles/GSPR, and regulatory intelligence easy. These functions, plus soon-to-be-released features, were formally messaged in the rebrand, including superior server security, system compliance, and simple integrations with many leading enterprise QMS and ERP/PLM software systems.
"With successful implementations in some of the world’s leading medical technology companies including Johnson & Johnson and Terumo, we already know Rimsys has the power to modernize medtech companies of all sizes and scales," said Gianoutsos. "And now, with a brand that mirrors our capabilities, we’re even better poised to reach out and help more."
Components of the rebrand can be seen on rimsys.io, and the full rebrand will be revealed on a new website that is currently under development.
Announcing the release of Rimsys 3.0: Rimsys Insight
Rimsys Regulatory Management Software, the leading and only Regulatory Information Management (RIM) system platform designed specifically for the medtech industry, has just released Rimsys 3.0, which includes its much anticipated regulatory intelligence module, Rimsys Insight.
Rimsys 3.0 now offers curated regulatory news along with changes to laws, regulations, and guidances that are timely and linked to customers’ specific products, markets and the other customizable filters available to each company. Additionally, the integration of market entrance requirements for the top 50+ global markets, further strengthen the already powerful Rimsys Registrations workflow which manages medical device and IVD registrations at the SKU level.
"Information is meaningless unless you can apply context to it as it relates to your company and products. As regulatory professionals ourselves, we know the specific pain that is experienced by our customers. The user experience should be seamless, fully integrated, and intuitive enough that, regardless of how long that person has been in the industry"
Rimsys was built for and by regulatory affairs professionals, enabling teams to digitize and automate otherwise disjointed, paper-based and manual processes. Rimsys has spent the last year working with customers from some of the world’s leading medical device manufacturers to develop the requirements that seamlessly integrate their business processes with its existing ecosystem of cloud-based regulatory affairs software solutions. This includes global product registrations, submissions management, standards management, essential principles and more.
"There’s simply no other holistic and vertically integrated solution quite like Rimsys out in the marketplace. Our initial features were focused on bringing MedTech companies together to collaborate and connect with each other internally. Built on this solid foundation, our latest release truly empowers and connects them to the entire global regulatory ecosystem"
Rimsys is a holistic approach to modernizing, digitizing and automating regulatory affairs activities for the MedTech industry by providing a single source of truth. Rimsys is now aligned and positioned to continue its growth and mission to "digitize, automate and createregulatory order for the medical technology industry™."
5 signs you are ready to take your medical device regulatory team digital
The medical device industry is in dire need of robust, practical and easy-to-use software to make regulatory professionals’ lives easier. Without a unified, collaborative, and regulatory digital system, serious consequences to a business can occur, including an increased risk of noncompliance, increased costs, and a significant reduction in a product’s revenue potential.
Here are the five biggest indicators that it’s time to take your medical device regulatory team digital.
1. You miss simple regulatory compliance requirements
Has your company missed an update to a standard? When a standard is updated that compliance is claimed for your products, a thorough review and associated gap analysis need to be conducted to determine if there is any impact to your products. You also need to go through every single essential requirements checklist to determine where that standard is referenced and update it throughout. If you miss those activities, you will most likely receive a finding when being audited that will require corrective action and significant resources to fix and ensure it doesn’t happen again.
Additionally, as the new Medical Device Single Audit Program (MDSAP) is rolled out, regulators from different markets are now working together to identify instances of noncompliance as well as misalignment of information in submissions and other communications.
MDSAP requires medical device manufacturers to produce evidence of marketing authorization for each country that they sell into. Your regulatory team needs automation to work for them in a way that creates safeguards to prevent unintentional release of products into markets.
There is a high need for more effective control of the submission process, enabled by a unified platform, which can lead to a leaner, higher quality submission and a reduced regulatory burden.
2. Your revenue is impacted
Are you missing registration dates, experiencing slow-to-market losses or long-term, cascading impacts such as loss of customer loyalty? All of these have an immediate and lasting impact on market capitalization.
If your marketing authorization lapses, your company legally cannot continue to sell within that country or market, guaranteeing your sales team becomes frustrated because they won’t hit their sales numbers and your company’s financial projections will be impacted.
Moreover, improper release of a product due to lack of visibility to regulatory statuses can cause fines and loss of credibility with authorities, which can result in increased scrutiny.
Based on a recent survey of 100 companies, 65% of regulatory professionals require at least a week to gather the information needed to determine where their products are sold and whether they are properly registered within a country or market.
If you can’t easily find the information, how effective and compliant can you really be? It may be time to take your regulatory team digital.
3. You miss your time-to-market targets
How do you organize and manage your regulatory information?
If you immediately thought of SharePoint, Excel, Word, Email, Outlook, or Dropbox, you probably aren’t working in the most efficient manner.
In fact, based on a Deloitte study, up to 50% of a regulatory team member’s time is wasted looking for information. Not only is your process inefficient but the way that you manage data and documents from a regulatory perspective is broken.
Based on FDA’s published data, 35% of all 510(k)s submitted to the FDA get stamped with Refuse to Accept (RTA) designation due to simple and avoidable mistakes.
Avoiding these needless delays in getting your products to market should be a top priority to ensure months or years are not added to getting your product the proper clearances.
4. You are burdened by administrative activities
Are you having trouble with efficiency, collaboration, and talent retention on your regulatory team?
Employee turnover on regulatory teams is linked to stress and increases greatly if team members consider processes to be inefficient or wasteful. Being able to perform one’s job efficiently and the perception of being part of a high-performing organization contributes to employee satisfaction and retention.
Regulatory processes touch multiple functional areas of a business in the highly regulated medical device industry. Regulatory teams have been piecing together disparate systems to achieve marginal improvement for years and are notoriously understaffed.
By giving them the right tools, so that they can do their jobs effectively and efficiently, should be priority number one.
5. You rely on institutionalized knowledge
Has a top member of your regulatory team left the organization, leaving you with no idea about what projects they had their hands in, the status of current submissions, broken down communications with external stakeholders, or lost critical tribal knowledge that wasn’t passed down?
Have you ever called that employee at their new company just to “pick-their-brain” because that critical information wasn’t transferred before they left?
Having a fail-safe in place now for when (not if) your top talent leaves prevents the loss of company and product specific tribal knowledge.
Bringing your regulatory processes into the digital age so your team and company can perform work within a central location ensures everything is properly documented and builds that critical archive of information. A unified system and collaboration hub keeps everyone on the same page within a single regulatory platform. Think of it as your company’s regulatory insurance policy.
Employees change roles, leave departments, and move on to other companies, leaving you to pick up the pieces. Retraining a new employee without the subject matter expert can cause delays and wasted time. So stop relying on disparate systems, disjointed processes, color-coded excel files, and emails that get lost in the shuffle and inhibit progress.
The good news
There is good news. Software solutions already exist that create a collaboration hub to help medical device companies actively navigate the changing regulatory landscape.
Software solutions such as Rimsys Regulatory Management Software can empower your current team. They provide better planning and tracking in a unified system that can monitor process metrics, milestones, and automatically inform submissions plan timelines with actual performance. A solution that connects planning to execution, allowing improved, real-time process monitoring provides teams visibility to quickly spot constraints and take action, allowing products to get through your regulatory process faster and with improved compliance.
It is time to set the new standard for the industry. It is time to go digital and start automating your broken systems.
